Home Blog Page 4780

Where is the petroleum register? – Prof. Gatsi asks gov’t

0
Prof. Gatsi

Ghana’s latest contract with ExxonMobil Corp for oil exploration in the Deepwater Cape Three Points offshore (DWCTP) oilfield is going to add to a growing list of oil and gas contracts that have been shielded from the public – due to the non-existence of a ‘Petroleum Register’ as required by law, Prof. John Gatsi of the University of Cape Coast has said.

The economist said there is no excuse for why the register has not been created, two years into passage of the Petroleum Act 2016.

The petroleum register, he explained, is an accountability check and a pointer of disclosure and transparency; and not putting it in place would mean that contracts such as the one signed with ExxonMobil might not see the light of day.

Prof. Gatsi, who was speaking in an interview on the sidelines of a workshop for journalists in Koforidua, urged government and the Petroleum Commission to ensure that the register is put in place.

He said this should be done in addition to the other regulation that is needed for the enhanced enforcement or operationisation of the entire (Exploration and Production) Act 919, given that Ghana continues to expand its petroleum activities.

The Act states that: “The Commission shall establish and maintain a register of petroleum agreements, licences, permits, and authorisations as prescribed”.

Addressing members of the Institute of Finance and Economic Journalists (IFEJ) at a forum to review and interrogate PIAC’s 2017 Half-Year Annual Report, Prof. Gatsi noted that there cannot be effective petroleum management if citizens are not active in demanding accountability.

He said accountability is such that there are demand and supply aspects, in view of which he charged Ghanaians to hold duty-bearers accountable for effective utilisation and management of the country’s petroleum resources.

‘Best deal yet’

Energy Minister Boakye Agyarko, speaking at the signing of the ExxonMobil agreement last week, described it as one of the best – based on lessons from the country’s past ten years of producing oil.

The contract was signed following a direct negotiation between Ghana and Exxon Mobil without an open competitive tender.

The nature of the negotiation has led to calls for the contract to be made open. However, some commentators fear the full details of the agreement will not be made public, since the register of petroleum contracts has not been created for Ghanaians to know and understand the terms under which the agreement was signed as well as the benefits thereof.

Gov’t must come clean on the Saltpond oilfield – Prof. Gatsi

0
Head of Finance Department, UCC School of Business, Prof. John Gatsi

 

Government must clarify its plans for the Saltpond oilfield, following the decision by Ghana National Petroleum Company (GNPC) to halt the de-commissioning process and keep a skeleton staff on the ‘non-operational’ oilfield, Prof. John Gatsi has said.

The Head of Department of Finance, School of Business at the University of Cape Coast (UCC), said the recurring subject of decommissioning the field calls for investigations to bring finality to the issue, particularly given the back-and-forth stance of the GNPC.

He explained that the Petroleum (Exploration and Production) Act 919 gives specific roles to the Petroleum Commission and minister in charge of petroleum in ensuring speedy and effective decommissioning of oilfields.

Prof. Gatsi said the investment decision to keep the workers on the oilfield, per a cost benefit analysis, is not in the interest of the country.

He, therefore, urged that clarity be brought to whether or not some private benefit is taking place hence the declining interest to decommission the oilfield or otherwise.

“A new position should be given quickly so that we are very clear in our minds what is actually going on at the Saltpond oilfield,” he added.

The Public Interest and Accountability Committee (PIAC), in its ‘2017 Half-Year Annual Report’ on developments within the oil and gas industry, repeated its stance for the “GNPC to, as a matter of urgency, complete de-commissioning the Saltpond field.”

PIAC maintained that the cost of funding skeletal staff on the production platform was not a judicious use of resources. “In maintaining GNPC’s skeleton staff on the production platform, the Corporation spent US$74,193 on staff emoluments and maintenance-related costs.”

PIAC, in its 2016 Annual Report, also stated that the dwindling crude oil production volumes from the Saltpond field, coupled with rapidly falling global crude prices, are rendering the continuous operation of the Saltpond Field unviable.

A leading member of PIAC, Dr. Steve Manteaw, explained that the committee’s recommendation on decommissioning the field is premised on the fact that the country continues to pump money into an area where no returns are being recorded.

He however maintained that if the operators or regulator has or holds a view that is in contrast to PIAC’s position, that information has to be made public.

“We have made our recommendation; it is up to the authorities to respond and tell us why the decommissioning is not continuing.”

Background

Saltpond Offshore Producing Company, the country’s oldest producer of crude oil, shut down its producing wells in December 2015. The Ministry of Energy gave its approval for the field to be decommissioned, which enabled GNPC to start the contracting process to decommission the field.

The de-commissioning process’s first phase started in October 2016, and entailed selection of a Consultant to lead the process.

Technical and Financial proposals from shortlisted consultants were submitted and evaluations completed, but the decommissioning process was later suspended.

Gov’t to raise GH¢6bn to clear energy debts in March

0
Boakye Agyarko, Minister of Energy

Government is to issue a GH¢6billion bond to clear the remaining energy sector debt in March, 2018, Energy Minister Boakye Agyarko has confirmed.

We will come back to market in March [to raise] the balance of GH 6billion,” said Mr. Agyarko, who has consistently maintained that the half-decade of power rationing that led to the collapse of many an industry was purely a financial issue.

The proposed new bond issuance follows a similar exercise undertaken last year, as government sought to clear the huge debts on the books of various state-owned utilities and stabilise a banking sector that was under stress from non-performing loans advanced to utility companies.

After a year in office, the Akufo-Addo-led government has reduced the legacy debt in the energy sector by about 50 percent – having raised US$2.4billion from the 7-year and 10-year cedi-denominated bonds issued last year.

This has helped to greatly improve the liquidity of banks and balance sheets of state-owned enterprises in the energy sector.

A downward review of power tariff for industry, in line with government’s industrialisation drive which has the ‘One District, One Factory’ project at its core, has also been announced.

“An Industrial Development Tariff has been approved for industry to enhance its competitiveness.  A new rate of US$6.50 per Million British Thermal Units (MMBtu), as against the previous rate US$8.84 per Million British Thermal Units (MMBtu) has been established – representing a 26.5% reduction,” President Nana Addo Dankwa Akufo-Addo said last week when he met selected journalists at the seat of government – the Flagstaff House.

 

Diversification of power mix

The country’s current electricity demand is about 2,533MW. The largest power producer-VRA, and other Independent Power Producers (IPPs) together have an installed capacity of about 3, 644MW.

But with a growing electricity demand of about 10 percent per annum, access to cheap power remains a long-standing concern of businesses that are yet to fully recover from the shocks of the half-decade long erratic power supply.

However, constraints on fuel sources for power generation — crude oil, gas and water for hydro power generation — have necessitated the need for exploring cost-effective, reliable, and clean energy sources.

Given the current gas demand of about 450Mscf per day, indigenous gas and limited supply from the West Africa Gas Pipeline are unable to meet demand.

With the coming onstream of more oil and gas fields, the volume of indigenous gas is expected to increase in the medium-term. Available indigenous gas is, however, expected to run out by 2036, according to energy experts.

The Energy Ministry has therefore moved to ensure the country diversifies its power mix by targeting 300MW of solar by 2020.

The Bui Power Authority (BPA), in this regard, has expanded its switchyard at the Bui Generation Station (GS) to accommodate 250MW of solar-generated power.

 

Proposed new tariff reductions

President Akufo-Addo also recently announced proposals to reduce electricity tariffs by 18% (barbers), 15.7% (hairdressers and beauticians) and 9.8% (tailors) respectively. It is however unclear how government plans to finance such reductions, and how the meters are going to be differentiated.

 

Banks cautioned  

Emmanuel Akrong, a credit consultant, has told the B&FT that banks must be very cautious in lending to highly-indebted utilities going forward.

“Poor credit decisions” by commercial banks, he argues, contributed a lot to build-up of the debt, since the banks ignored the poor financial state of state-owned enterprises and lack of any “explicit guarantees” from government and went ahead to advance the credit to the VRA, ECG, GRIDCo, TOR and NEDCO.

“While I understand some of the reasons that led to this situation, I have pointed out on several occasions that I am not advocating banks should not lend to energy-sector SOEs.

“However, banks should lend to such entities in a responsible way by following good credit practices and not put the bank itself at risk – such as exceeding single obligator limits and ending up putting innocent civilians in the situation of paying for avoidable levies,” he said.

COLLATERAL LENDING: What is the Cost of collateral lending and opportunities for reform

0

The preferred approach to mitigating the risk inherent in a credit relationship between a lender and borrower is usually through the use of collateral. Both lenders and borrowers benefit from the pledging of collateral using well-designed and well-operated collateral processes. Legal claims are reduced when the secured creditor is allocated the assets pledged as collateral or the proceeds of the sale of assets, which eliminates the need for extensive litigation or the receivership or liquidation of companies. Information asymmetries are reduced when the borrower’s risk preferences are limited by the implied loss of valued assets. Secured credit reduces the risk of excessive borrowing as borrowers are restricted by the amount of collateral owned. Finally, borrowers that pledge collateral are granted a lower financing cost.

In Ghana, the collateral process is hampered by legal, regulatory and operational constraints. Since the option of collateral is limited, two scenarios have developed in Ghana:

  1. The cost of loans makes capital equipment more expensive for entrepreneurs relative to their counterparts in industrial countries, and, consequently, businesses postpone buying new equipment or finance it incrementally out of their own limited savings.
  2. Credit is rationed by lenders and therefore is limited to the larger and more established firms. Small businesses, in particular, are limited by the scarcity of financing, and the lack of new investment dampens productivity and limits income levels in the overall economy.

 

Principles of an Effective Collateral Process

The collateral process and surrounding legal and operational environments include three main components:

  • The creation of security interests;
  • The perfection of security interests, including public knowledge of their existence and priority; and
  • The Enforcement of security interests.

Obstacles to effective collateral processes affect each of these three components. Increasing difficulty, expense and uncertainty related to the creation of security interests prevent public understanding of the perfection of security interests and cause the enforcement of security interests to be slow and expensive.

Process Creation and perfection of collateral

Creation and perfection of collateral occurs when a borrower who has an interest in property, or who holds the power to transfer the interest, transfers it to a lender as collateral in exchange for a loan facility. (Property is used in the widest meaning of the word here – anything that can be possessed.)

Security interests created in Ghana must be perfected to render them valid and enforceable against the grantor and as notice to the world. When a security interest in property is superior to other interests and claims to the property, it is said to be perfected. Put simply, perfection is the validation of legal documents. It involves the taking of additional steps to render the rights created under a legal document effective against third parties and/or to retain its effectiveness in the event of default by a party. Generally, the collateral perfection process is as follows

  1. Search and due diligence: Search at the appropriate land registry or registries (and sometimes survey department) to find out the legal ownership of a property. Due diligence on the identity of the owner to ensure we are dealing with the right person or entity. Landed collateral process starts with search to verify ownership and if any encumbrance on the property.
  2. Creation: drafting of legal documentation to enable the bank take security, signing the security and witnessing the signatures of the parties
  3. Perfection: payment of stamp duty if required, consent if required, and registration at the appropriate land registry, BoG Collateral Registry or other government department
  4. Enforcement: Realization of the asset

Hitherto charges over moveable assets from non-corporate entities could not be registered.  The Registrar General department is used for registration of collateral of corporate entities.

The collateral registry created by Borrowers and Lenders Act, 2008 [Act 773] is intended to widen the collateral base beyond landed property which is usually the main collateral taken from non-corporate entities. Collateral over movables can now be registered at the Collateral Registry. The collateral registry is to principally register charges and collaterals created by borrowers to secure credit facilities provided by lenders

It is the security that is registered. But of course the security is based on documents. It is the responsibility of the lender to ensure the proper documents are in place and properly described when inputting it into the Collateral Registry database. If you don’t put in the correct details if anyone conducts a search based on the right details your charge will not show up. Hence inputter and authorizer to ensure correct information is provided. The search and due diligence on the property will confirm that land certificate is correct and that a borrower manufactures land title for same property and presents it to another bank. The charge document will not be drafted until title document is confirmed via a search report. Each stage of the process in critical. The next stage is built on the foundation of the previous process i.e. 1. Search and due diligence 2. Creation 3. Perfection 4. Enforcement

Generally, perfection involves

  • The stamping and
  • Registration of the security documents with public registries.

 

  1. Stamping

Stamping is the making of an impression on a legal document, by a public authority in pursuance of law and for which a tax or duty is exacted.

In Ghana, stamping is administered by the Land Valuation Division of the Lands Commission on behalf of the Ghana Revenue Authority under the Stamp Duty Act, 2005 (Act 689) (the “Stamp Duty Act”).

Under the Stamp Duty Act, all security documents are required to be duly and properly stamped to render them admissible in evidence and enforceable in the courts of Ghana. An unstamped or insufficiently stamped document will therefore not be admitted into evidence in court and a person cannot rely on it to make his case.

Security documents may be stamped upon payment of the appropriate stamp duty. It must be noted that, while some security documents may be expressed to be exempt from stamp duty (either by the Stamp Duty Act or under some binding agreement such as a bilateral trade agreement), such security documents are required to be stamped as “exempt” regardless of the exemption.

Security documents must be stamped within two months of execution or as the case may be, within two months after first receipt in Ghana, where the security documents were executed outside Ghana.

The Stamp Duty Act allows for late stamping of security documents upon the payment of a penalty of GHS 30. However, where the unpaid stamp duty exceeds GHS 30, there is a further penalty by way of interest on the unpaid stamp duty at a rate of 5% per annum, from the date of execution up to the time when the interest is equal in amount to the unpaid stamp duty.

Security documents are subject to ad valorem tax in Ghana. Primary security is subject to stamp duty at a rate of 0.5% of the secured liability/obligation while any auxiliary security is subject to stamp duty at a rate of 0.25% of the secured liability/obligation.

Where after stamping, the security document is subsequently amended to increase the secured liability, the security agreement is required to be stamped-up. Stamp duty of 0.5% or 0.25% as the case may be; shall be payable on the difference between the secured liabilities.

In Ghana, stamping precedes registration with other registries in Ghana. Security documents therefore cannot undergo other forms of perfection unless it is fully stamped. Further, any person who registers an unstamped security document for purposes of official records commits an offence and is liable on summary conviction to a fine.

  1. Registration

Registration is the act or process of recording or enrolling specified information in an official or public register or records.

Generally, all charges in the form of security are required to be registered in the public registries to serve as notice of the creation of the charge to the world.

There are three main registries that security documents must be registered with in Ghana.

  1. Companies Registry

Under section 107 of Companies Act of Ghana, 1963 (Act 179) (the “Companies Act”), a security created by companies incorporated in Ghana are required to be registered with the Registrar of Companies. Any unregistered security created over the assets of a company is void as a security and all monies secured by the charge becomes immediately payable.

Particulars of the security created (with the security document annexed) are required to be registered with the Registrar-General’s Department of the Ministry of Justice and Attorney General which performs the functions of the Registrar of Companies (the “Companies Registry”).

All securities created must be registered within twenty-eight (28) days of the creation of the security, however, the courts may grant an extension of time for the filing of a security document on justifiable grounds.

Registration of a charge with the Companies Registry constitutes actual notice of the creation of the charge (but not the contents of the security document) to persons dealing with the company from the date of registration.

It is worth mentioning, however, that pledges or possessory liens on goods, charges by way of pledge, deposit, and letters of hypothecation or trust receipts, bills of lading, promissory notes and bills of exchange are exempt from this requirement of registration.

On successfully completing registration, the Companies Registry issues a certificate of registration as evidence of registration.

Regarding release of a security duly registered, companies are required to commence the process by application in a prescribed form to the Companies Registry. The Registrar of Companies, upon proof of satisfaction in whole or in part of the debt for which the charge was given or the release of the whole or part of the property charged, will issue a memorandum of satisfaction.

  1. Collateral Registry

The Collateral Registry is an online registry set up under the Borrowers and Lenders Act of Ghana, 2008 (Act 773) to record all registration of charges pledged by borrowers to secure credit facilities provided by lenders.

A borrower (any person who has concluded a credit agreement with a lender) or any person interested in a charge or collateral is required to register the particulars of the charge or collateral created in favour of a lender with the Collateral Registry. The security created must be registered within twenty-eight (28) days of the creation of the charge or collateral.

An unregistered charge or collateral is of no effect as security for a borrower’s obligations for the repayment of the money secured and the money secured immediately becomes payable despite any provision to the contrary in any contract.

Only charges created from February 1, 2010 and covering GHS 500 and above are eligible for registration with the Collateral Registry.

In the case of companies, the requirement to register charges created is in addition to the requirement to register charges created with the Companies Registry.

Regarding the release of a security duly registered, the Registrar shall issue a memorandum of release of debt in the register and furnish the borrower with a copy of the memorandum, upon application (online) in prescribed form with proof of payment in part or whole of the debt secured and release of the whole or part of the property secured.

3, Lands Registry

There is no timeline for the registration of a mortgage, however, the mortgage created shall not have effect until duly registered.  Registration of the mortgage constitutes actual notice of the particulars of the security to all persons and for all purposes from the date of registration of the charge.

A mortgage may be discharged by an endorsement on the mortgage instrument or by way of a separate document (a deed of discharge).

 

Enforcement of collateral

The Borrowers and Lenders Act 2008 (Act 773) provides that prior to enforcement of security, the secured party must deliver a 30-day notice of default to the borrower and allow the borrower 30 days to remedy the breach. The notice of default must be registered with the Collateral Registry, and should contain the date of default under the relevant finance document(s) and the date on which the borrower receives the notice. After the 30-day period, the registrar of the Collateral Registry will issue a certificate confirming the enforcement of security. Other than with respect to land (on which see below), all realizations of charges over non-cash assets must be by way of auction sale. Any disposal of land subject to a mortgage is typically permissible only under a court- approved sale arrangement or by an out-of-court auction organized in accordance with the Auction Sales Act 1989 (PNDCL 230). The net proceeds of enforcement must be distributed in the following order:

  • Amounts required to discharge reasonable costs the chargor incurred in realizing the security;
  • Amounts required to discharge legal expenses to the extent the credit agreement permits
  • Amounts required to discharge the secured obligations
  • Amounts the borrower owes to persons who have a subordinate charge in the secured assets
  • Amounts the borrower owes any other person who has given the secured party notice of its interest in the secured assets. The balance of net proceeds, following these distributions, must be returned to the borrower

Out-of-court enforcement regarding any asset is generally permitted under Ghanaian law. Governmental consents are only required prior to enforcement of security if the security is granted over an asset in which a Ghanaian governmental or statutory authority has an interest, or is in respect of a governmental authorisation or license.

Generally, there are no restrictions on who can enforce a security interest over assets in Ghana, provided that the person seeking the enforcement is the secured party, its trustee, agent, assignee, successor or transferee. From a practical perspective, a secured party that is a foreign entity can require a local receiver to act on its behalf.

 

Insolvency / bankruptcy proceedings

Primary legislation for bankruptcy and insolvency in Ghana in respect of limited liability companies is contained in: (a) Act 179 which applies to voluntary insolvency (also referred to as private liquidations), and (b) the Bodies Corporate (Official Liquidation) Act 1963 (Act 180) which applies to an insolvent company (the Company Insolvency Rules).

  • Members’ voluntary winding up / private liquidation: Voluntary liquidation is only available if the company is solvent. The members of a company may wind up the company if the: − Directors swear an affidavit that the company is solvent − Company passes a special resolution to wind up the company voluntarily, with the resolution providing for the appointment of the liquidator. After the company’s debts have been paid, the company’s number is struck off the Companies’ Register with notice published in a public gazette.
  • Creditors’ winding up: If a company is insolvent, its liquidation must be by official liquidation whereby the company may be placed into receivership or be wound up by its creditors. Under Ghanaian law, official liquidation may be commenced by either: − A special resolution of the company − A petition to the Registrar of Companies by a company member or creditor − Conversion from a private liquidation (where it is determined that the company cannot, in fact, pay its debts) − A petition to the court by a member, creditor or Registrar of Companies Note, the Company Insolvency Rules do not apply to statutory corporations or State-owned entities, which instead must be wound up by a legislative instrument issued by the President.

 

Constraints to the collateral process in Ghana

Weak and dispersed legal framework:

There are many statutes regulating the creation and perfection of collateral. Collateral perfection in Ghana is legislated by different laws. First a collateral charge needs to be registered with the Registrar General in accordance with the companies’ code, then with the land commission for land title/land registry and then with collateral registry in accordance with the borrowers and lenders act[1].  Each of these channels of collateral charges have equal priority in law. So a bank needs to register with all the channels.  The laws lack uniformity and result in a convoluted conveyance system. For example, freedom to contract has been severely curtailed by the statutes that inhibit property rights through archaic procedures and regulations. In addition, stamp duty is expensive both in its direct cost and in the method of its collection;

Multiplicity of registries

There are a multiplicity of registries, including:

  1. companies registries (section 107 of the Companies Act, 1963 (Act 179) to register charges with the Registrar of Companies) ,
  2. DVLA (vehicle registration) ,
  3. land commission (under Land Registry Act 1962 (Act 22) or Land Registry Act 1962 (Act 122) and
  4. collateral registry (If collateral charge document was created after February 1, 2010, it should be registered with the Collateral Registry in accordance with the Lenders and Borrowers Act, 2007 (Act 773)  .

Injunctions

Furthermore, the process of realizing the loan amount outstanding from security liquidation (enforcement) has proved to be very cumbersome and costly for lenders. The owners of property obtain court injunctions and restraining orders, which sometimes make it difficult to dispose the said property leaving the  lender with unrealized securities and non-performing loans.

The first line of defense for many borrowers when faced with the threat of repossession of an asset is an injunction. An injunction is a judicial remedy issued at a court’s discretion. It may either prohibit or restrain a party from performing a certain act (prohibitive) or require the respondent to perform certain actions in preparation for court.

An injunction may be sought as a final remedy or at a preliminary stage before trial (an interlocutory/interim injunction). In most cases during debt recovery, an interim injunction is sought pending the outcome of trial.

In determining whether to grant an interim injunction, the courts apply three principles:

  1. That the claimant can show that there is a serious issue to be determined;
  2. That the court considers where the balance of convenience lies. Important things to consider will be: a) the court’s ability to quantify likely damages; b) the sufficiency of the claimant’s cross-undertaking in damages (if the defendant is successful at trial); and c) the sufficiency of the defendant’s financial resources to compensate the claimant (if the claimant is successful at trial);
  • If there is no imbalance, then the status quo is preserved.

In theory, the court must be satisfied that the claim is not frivolous or vexatious and should not attempt an in-depth assessment of either party’s case and the likely outcome of the infringement proceedings at trial. In practice, borrowers routinely obtain injunctions from courts restraining lenders from enforcing their rights of recovery. This discreditable practice is highly prevalent despite the statute being fairly clear on the nature of statutory power of sale, statutory notice and the remedies to an aggrieved party. Courts have argued that in trying to be just, they have faced difficulty in getting lenders to justify the hefty interest rates and penalties routinely imposed on borrowers upon default, which often causes confusion over the amount actually owed.

Though there have been cases where the courts have resolved not to grant indulgence to defaulting borrowers, in most cases injunctive relief has been granted, and borrowers are aware that their chances of avoiding the loss of the pledged asset via the courts is very high. As a consequence, lenders prefer to renegotiate and find alternative ways of arriving at settlements with borrowers, upon the understanding that the courts are highly unlikely to provide them with redress.

 

 Stamp duty as a deterrent to creating security interests

Stamp duty is a large component of the cost of collateral. In addition to the cost, the archaic physical collection process and procedures further complicate the collateral process.

Incomplete and unreliable search methods

Weak enforcement mechanisms

The realisation process in Ghana is slow and expensive. Even in instances of uncontested realisations, the lender has to issue notice of more than 30 days in the case of immovable property. The lender or other enforcer is also often required to obtain consent to facilitate a sale, which makes the success of the process dependent upon independent (or sometimes not so independent) public officials. In the event that the matter becomes contentious, the recovery process is hampered by the costly and highly procedural judicial process.

Court system

Commercial courts have been established to expedite the realisation process, but this has been ineffective as there is a shortage of judges and judicial officers. This has resulted in a severe backlog of cases, resulting in cases taking a minimum of three years and up to a maximum of ten years before resolution. Furthermore, there is a general perception among lenders that the courts will not resolve the issue in their favour, and that, if they do, it will be too late for any meaningful recovery to take place, as assets will have been sold, lost or damaged.

Weak insolvency framework

Based on the 2017 Barclays African Group Financial Market Index[2],   Ghana generally scored well, based on their enforcement of netting and collateral positions. However, the report noted that Ghana’s insolvency framework is the weakest in the index. Despite adhering to international standard master agreements, with the exception of Global Master Securities Lending Agreement (GMSLA), and enforcing netting and collateral positions, it fails to adequately resolve insolvency without incurring high recovery costs for creditors. On average, the payment recovery rate is 23 cents on the dollar, 12 cents below that of South Africa.

The length of the foreclosure proceedings can vary from less than 1 year to up to 5 years. Creditors have less incentive to start the foreclosure proceedings if they know from the start that the proceedings may take years (with longer proceedings typically favouring degradation of collateral) and debtor discipline may be lower, as debtors may be less inclined to meet their payment obligations if loan enforcement is not a credible deterrent. IMF data tends to show that the level of NPLs is lower in countries where the foreclosure period is shorter.

Recommendations

Unified land registration

There are currently two land statutes dealing with immovable property in its various forms in Ghana; deed registration and title registration. There should be one unified code of law relating to immovable property, as it is imperative that land, both urban and rural, becomes a viable source of collateral.

Reform Stamp duty

The current stamp duty is costly, unfair and cumbersome. It needs to be either substantially reformed or replaced. One option would be to replace the stamp duty with a tax on bank debits. The benefits of this tax would be immediacy and ease of collection, the lack of forms or any other bureaucratic procedures, fairness (those who spend more pay more) and fiscal gains.

 

Alternatively, the Stamp Duty Act could be reformed to make it more responsive to circumstances by establishing low rates that depend on the property or interest being created, by whom and for what purpose. In addition, the process of paying stamp duty needs to be revised to allow for non-physical presence, immediate payment and receipting.

Single registry

Integrate all channels of registration of collateral charges: companies registries (section 107 of the Companies Act, 1963 (Act 179) to register charges with the Registrar of Companies) ,  DVLA (vehicle registration) , land commission (under Land Registry Act 1962 (Act 22) or Land Registry Act 1962 (Act 122) and collateral registry (If collateral charge document was created after February 1, 2010, it should be  registered with the Collateral Registry in accordance with the Lenders and Borrowers Act, 2007 (Act 773)  so that a charge over collateral registered at one or more channels automatically get registered at all the other channels

Judicial system for repossession

The current procedures for repossession are not effective as courts readily grant injunctions allowing borrowers to stop the realisation process pending the resolution of a dispute. While the litigation continues, the borrower is able to enjoy the asset. This has in many cases resulted in the asset being lost and/or dissipated, making the lender unable to recover, if at all, the amount owed. To overcome this, I suggests the following solution:  Strengthen the out-of-court system for repossession. The statute already covers the events of default and repossession; therefore such repossession needs to proceed only upon court notification and not approval, which would normally require a hearing process. In the case of the need for injunctions, for these to be granted, the borrower would need to deposit with the court the asset or the principal amount owed until the case is determined. The court holds the asset in an escrow account.  This would ensure that no party benefits when real disputes occur.

 Alternative dispute resolution mechanisms

Lenders shy away from alternative dispute resolutions as, under the current form, these typically do not enforce repossession. It would appear that currently arbitrators seek to mediate between the parties rather than enforce the contract. Therefore, alternative dispute resolution mechanisms should obligate fulfilment of contractual obligations, particularly in terms of enforcement of security.

 Increase in number of specialized commercial courts

Commercial courts have been established to expedite commercial disputes. After initial success, these courts have begun to experience backlogs as the courts sit only in Nairobi and have a shortage of judges and other judicial officers. There is therefore a need to increase the number of judges and judicial officers, as well as to establish regional commercial courts. An additional area that could be explored is the creation of separate courts to deal with debt recovery within the commercial court system.

Strengthen the insolvency framework in Ghana

Specific proposals for legal and judicial reforms in Ghana include:

 

  • The provisions of the Companies Act, 1963 (Act 179), the Bodies Corporate (Official Liquidations) Act, 1963 (Act 180), or any other enactment relating to corporate insolvency or liquidation should be enhanced to include : (1) expedient in-court approval of settlements negotiated out of court ; (2) post-commencement financing recognizing creditor priority to enable financing for the firm during restructuring (3) inclusive restructuring involving all creditors (including secured and public creditors)  (4) pre-insolvency processes that enable restructuring before reaching nonviability; (6) simplified and cost-effective insolvency processes for SMEs enabling a fresh start for entrepreneurs within a reasonable time period and (7) the facilitation of various restructuring tools, such as debt-equity swaps (for example, through removing the requirement for shareholders to approve corporate changes).
  • Fixing the loopholes in the Borrowers and Lenders Act that encourages some borrowers to sue banks on some issue such as contesting the quantum of the loan amount indicated in the demand letter and making possession of collateral difficult.

[1] BOG collateral registry is intended to widen the collateral base. Hitherto charges over moveable assets from non corporate entities could not be registered. Registrar General is only in relation to corporate entities

 

[2] See page 33 of https://www.omfif.org/media/3677495/barclays-africa-group-financial-markets-index-2017.pdf

AAMI calls on all non-member companies to join association

0

The Association of Alcohol Manufacturers and Importers(AAMI) encourages all non-member alcohol companies to join the association to create a united force at all levels so as to enhance engagement with stakeholders.

The AAMI has been established by major producers and importers of alcoholic beverages in Ghana to coordinate and direct activities toward the responsible production and use of alcoholic products in Ghana, and is currently made up of 25 member-companies.

The Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of the FDA, Hudu Mogtari, had expressed concern about the unregulated advertisement of alcohol and its deleterious effects on children and the youth in Ghana in 2016 – after which a regulation was enforced to regulate those activities in December 2017.

Following this recent enforcement of an advertising regulation by the Food and Drugs Authority (FDA) – which prevents manufacturers of alcoholic products from advertising their products on radio and television between the hours of 6am and 8pm, per the FDA’s guidelines for the advertisement (section 3.2.6) – the association needs to ensure and project responsibility and a strong standing to bargain on behalf of its members.

With this backdrop, the AAMI is engaging the FDA and other stakeholders to find an amicable solution that will promote responsible attitudes and behaviour in the marketing and consumption of alcoholic beverages – as well as protect the marketing freedoms of alcohol manufacturers and importers, guaranteeing their sustainability and growth as key contributors to the development of Ghana.

However, according to Gabriel Opoku-Asare-vice chairman of AAMI, whereas most members comply with the association’s code and the FDA’s regulation, it is also regrettable that some manufacturers and importers who are not members of the association continue to flout these regulations – which might bring the entire alcohol industry’s reputation into disrepute.

The association, in 2016, adopted a code of commercial communication to regulate the conduct of their business in the advertisement of members’ brands as an essential measure in the association’s partnership with government and maintaining public trust. The code ensures that members maintain the highest standards in all their commercial communications: including advertising in print and electronic media; packing, merchandising; consumer promotions, product placement; point of sale information and sponsorships – but non-members are not adhering to the codes of conduct.

Some of the association’s registered members are: Guinness Ghana Ltd.; Kasapreko Co. Ltd; Accra Brewery Limited; GIHOC Distilleries Company Ltd.; Agya Appiah Bitters Ltd.; GBL Brewery Ltd.; Don Emilio Limited; and ATLANTIC Beverages among others.

Cash for seat saga: Adhoc C’ttee granted one week extension

0

Parliament has granted a one week extension of time to the five-member Adhoc Committee probing the alleged cash for saga to submit its report to the plenary for consideration.

The extension was granted by the leadership of the House following a request tabled in by the Committee.

“Mr. Speaker, leadership is informed that the Committee has not been able to conclude their public sittings on the matter and wants an extension of time to finish the inquiry. Leadership has accordingly agreed to the request and granted them one more week. In the event, the Committee is requires to submit their report not later than Wednesday, January 31, 2018”, the Majority Leader, Osei Kyei-Mensah-Bonsu announced on the floor during Tuesday’s sitting.

The Committee was expected to submit its report to the plenary for consideration and adoption, Wednesday, January 24, 2018.

B&FT understands that the request for extension of time was spurred by the failure of the expatriates business community that graced that Ghana Expatriate Business Awards late last year.

The expatriates on Tuesday, January 16, 2018 failed to appear before the Committee chaired by Hon. Kwesi Ameyaw Cheremeh for questioning.

No reason was assigned to their action.

At least some twenty representatives from the various expatriate businesses were expected to appear before the Committee to assist with investigations into the alleged cash for seat saga.

Chairman of the Committee in a brief remarks prior to adjourning the sitting promised to re-engage the expatriates for a new date for the hearing.

Sources close to the Committee say the extension of time will afford the Committee to re-engage some of the expatriate businesses that attended the Ghana Expatriates Business Award.

On January 5, 2018, the Minority Chief Whip moved a motion at an emergency Parliamentary sitting calling on the House to investigate the alleged levies collected by the Ministry of Trade & Industry of the Ghana Cedi equivalent of various sums up to US$100,000.00 from expatriate businesses and related matters during the recently held Ghana Expatriates Business Awards in Accra.

According to him, the documents at his disposal clearly showed that some monies were collected from expatriates, noting that such was unethical. 

The motion was seconded by the MP for North Tongu, Samuel Okudzeto Ablakwa.

But the Majority Leader, Osei Kyei-Mensah-Bonsu debating the motion told the House that the mover of the motion himself did not sign the affidavit attached to his motion.

Apart from that 28 MPs whose names were captured in the list of 77 as having signed to the affidavit calling for the emergency sitting had no signature against their names.

Some of the Members include the Second Deputy Speaker, Hon Alban Bagbin, MP for Asunafo South, Hon. Eric Opoku, MP for Asutifi South, Collins Dauda, MP for Damongo, Adam Mutawakilu, MP for Korle Klottey, Zenator Rawlings, MP for Ablekuma South, Alfred Okoe Vanderpuije and Felicia Adjei, MP for Kintampo South.

The rest are MP for Agona East, Queenstar Pokua Sawyerr, MP for Tamale Central, Inusah Fuseini, and MP for Sekyere Afram Plains, Alex Adomako Mensah among others.

He told the House that based on the procedural irregularities which he considered to be gross abuse of the processes of Parliament, it was important for the Speaker to dismiss “what we have before us is incompetence”. 

However, the Speaker after listening to the debate on the issue ruled that even though there were procedural irregularities in the motion filed by the minority, the matter before the House was of grave importance.

He therefore directed the House be suspended for thirty minutes to enable the mover of the motion to correct the procedural irregularities.

But such correction was not done when the House resumed sitting.

The Speaker ruling on the matter directed that a five-member committee be set up to investigate the matter.

The five are; Majority Chief Whip, Kwesi Ameyaw Cheremeh, Chairman, MP for Adenta, Yaw Buabeng Asamoah, MP for New Juabeng South, Dr. Mark Assibey-Yeboah, MP for Ketu North, James Klutse Avedzi and MP for Bolgatanga, Dominic Ayeni.

The terms of reference to committee include; 

1. When did the matter under consideration arise?

2. Can it be perceived in terms of what the lawyers normally describe as Novus Actus Intervenus – is it something new that has arisen?

3. Will the matter has been raised during the regular sitting session with prudent vigilance? 

4. Has the matter been raised in any form or whatsoever during the session and why raise it in the moment Parliament goes on recess?

Council of State urged to deepen collaboration with Parliament

0

The Member of Parliament for Hohoe, Dr. Bernice Adiku Heloo, has appealed to the Council of State to collaborate more effectively with the legislature on matters of national concern in order to enhance the work of government.

She stated that Articles 90 and 91 of the 1992 Constitution has made several provisions for the Council of State to make inputs into the drafting of bills and initiate or make recommendations for Parliament’s consideration.

In addition, she explained that Parliament’s standing order 53 allows the Council of State to provide messages to the legislature.

“The thing is that for a very long time, we have never had such messages coming from this noble institution so it is important that they take up the challenge and comment on important issues that come before Parliament.

So we can also have access to their rich knowledge and experience, so that in the affairs of Parliament we can also say they have contributed to some of our debates and bills that we enact into Acts” she told B&FT in an interview.

These provisions according to her has not been taken advantage of by the Council of State over the years.

Members of the Council of State are made up of eminent men and women and she expects that bills that are passed in Parliament can be scrutinized by them.

Dr. Heloo also maintained that, showing continuous interest in Parliamentary issues is the way to go to enhance the democratic credentials of the country.

The 1992 Constitution stipulates that there shall be a Council of State to counsel the President in the performance of his functions.

Among their functions includes : they shall consider and advise the President or any other authority in respect of any appointment which is required by this Constitution or any other law to be made in accordance with the advice of, or in consultation with, the Council of State.

CEO optimism booms despite increasing anxiety over threats to growth

0
  • Optimism in global economic growth reaches record level and rises in all countries
  • US reinforces its lead on China as a target market for growth in 2018
  • Over half of CEOs expect their headcount to increase
  • Terrorism, geopolitical uncertainty, cyber and climate change rise as threats to growth

 A record-breaking share of CEOs are optimistic about the economic environment worldwide, at least in the short term. That’s one of the key findings of PwC’s 21st survey of almost 1,300 CEOs around the world, launched  at the World Economic Forum Annual Meeting in Davos.

Fifty seven percent of business leaders say they believe global economic growth will improve in the next 12 months. It’s almost twice the level of last year (29%) and the largest ever increase since PwC began asking about global growth in 2012.

Optimism in global growth has more than doubled in the US (59%) after a period of uncertainty surrounding the election (2017: 24%). Brazil also saw a large increase in the share of CEOs who are optimistic global growth will improve (+38% to 80%). And even among the less optimistic countries such as Japan (2018: 38% vs. 2017: 11%) and the UK (2018: 36% vs. 2017: 17%), optimism in global growth has more than doubled since last year.

“CEOs’ optimism in the global economy is driven by the economic indicators being so strong. With the stock markets booming and GDP predicted to grow in most major markets around the world, it’s no surprise CEOs are so bullish,” comments Bob Moritz, Global Chairman, PwC.

Confidence in short-term revenue growth on the rise

This optimism in the economy is feeding into CEOs’ confidence about their own companies’ outlook, even if the uptick is not so large. 42% percent of CEOs said they are “very confident” in their own organisation’s growth prospects over the next 12 months, up from 38% last year.

Looking at the results by country, it’s a mixed bag. CEOs’ outlook improved in several key markets including in Australia (up 4% to 46%) and China (up 4% to 40%), where the share of CEOs saying they are “very confident” in their own organisation’s 12-month growth prospects rose.

In the US, CEOs’ confidence has recovered. After election nerves last year, the early focus on regulation and tax reform by the new administration has seen confidence in business growth prospects for the year ahead rising significantly – from 39% in 2017 to 52% in 2018. And North America is the only region where a majority of CEOs are “very confident” about their own 12-month prospects.

In the UK, with Brexit negotiations only recently reaching a significant milestone, business leaders’ drop in short-term confidence is unsurprising (2018: 34% vs. 2017: 41%).

The top three most confident sectors for their own 12-month prospects this year are Technology (48% “very confident”), Business Services (46%) and Pharmaceutical and Life Sciences (46%) – all exceeding the global “very confident” level of 42%.

Strategies for growth remain largely unchanged on last year’s survey – CEOs will rely on organic growth (79%), cost reduction (62%), strategic alliances (49%) and M&As (42%). There was a small increase in interest in partnering with entrepreneurs and start-ups (33% vs 28% last year).

Top countries for growth: Confidence in US continues, reinforcing lead on China

CEO confidence in the US market extends overseas, with non-US based CEOs once again voting it the top market for growth in the next 12 months. This year, the US reinforces its lead on China (46% US vs 33% China, with the US lead over China up 2% compared with 2017).

Germany (20%) remains in third place, followed by the UK (15%) in fourth place, while India bumps Japan as the fifth most attractive market in 2018.

“Even with high levels of global growth confidence, business leaders want and need safe harbours for investment to secure short-term growth,” comments Bob Moritz, Global Chairman, PwC. “Access to consumers, skills, finance and a supportive regulatory environment are reinforcing leading markets’ positions, for business leaders to achieve their short-term growth targets.”

Jobs and digital skills: headcounts to increase; leaders concerned about availability of digital talent

Confidence in short-term revenue growth is feeding into jobs growth, with 54% of CEOs planning to increase their headcount in 2018 (2017: 52%). Only 18% of CEOs expect to reduce their headcount.

Healthcare (71%), Technology (70%), Business Services (67%) Communications (60%) and Hospitality and Leisure (59%) are amongst the sectors with the highest demand for new recruits.

On digital skills specifically, over a quarter (28%) of CEOs are extremely concerned about their availability within the country they are based, rising to 49% extremely concerned in South Africa, 51% in China and 59% in Brazil.

Overall, 22% of CEOs are extremely concerned about the availability of key digital skills in the workforce, 27% in their industry and 23% at the leadership level.

Investments in modern working environments, learning and development programmes and partnering with other providers are the top strategies to help them attract and develop the digital talent they need.

Impact of technology on employment and skills

While recent research by PwC showed that workers were optimistic about technology improving their job prospects, CEOs admit that helping employees retrain, and increasing transparency on how automation and AI could impact jobs is becoming a more important issue for them.

Two thirds of CEOs believe they have a responsibility to retrain employees whose roles are replaced by technology, chiefly amongst the Engineering & Construction (73%), Technology (71%) and Communications (77%) sectors. 61% of CEOs build trust with their workforce by creating transparency, at least to some extent, on how automation and AI impact their employees.

Bob Moritz, Global Chairman, PwC, comments:

“Our education systems need to arm a global workforce with the right skills to succeed.  Governments, communities, and businesses need to truly partner to match talent with opportunity, and that means pioneering new approaches to educating students and training workers in the fields that will matter in a technology-enabled job market. It also means encouraging and creating opportunities for the workforce to retrain and learn new skills throughout their careers. As the interest in apprenticeships and internships shows, lifelong training relevant to a business or industry is critical.”

The digital and automation transition is particularly acute in the Financial Services sector. Almost a quarter (24%) of Banking & Capital Markets and Insurance CEOs plan workforce reductions, with 28% of Banking & Capital Markets jobs likely to be lost to a large extent due to technology and automation.

Threats to growth: CEOs fear wider societal threats they can’t control

Despite the optimism in the global economy, anxiety is rising on a much broader range of business, social and economic threats. CEOs are ‘extremely concerned’ about geopolitical uncertainty (40%), cyber threats (40%), terrorism (41%), availability of key skills (38%) and populism (35%). These threats outpace familiar concerns about business growth prospects such as exchange rate volatility (29%) and changing consumer behaviour (26%).

Underlining the shift, extreme concern about terrorism doubled (2018: 41% vs 2017: 20%) and terrorism enters the top 10 threats to growth. The threat of over-regulation remains the top concern for CEOs (42% extremely concerned), and over a third (36%) remain concerned about an increasing tax burden.

Key skills availability is the top concern for CEOs in China (2018: 64% extremely concerned vs. 2017: 52%). In the US (63%) and the UK (39%), cyber has become the top threat for CEOs displacing over-regulation. And in Germany, cyber jumped from being the fifth threat in 2017 to third place (28%) this year.

A year after the Paris Agreement was signed by over 190 nations, which saw countries commit to voluntary action on climate change and low carbon investment, CEOs’ concern about the threat of climate change and environmental damage to growth prospects has now doubled to 31% of CEOs (2017: 15%).

High-profile extreme weather events and the US withdrawal from the Paris Agreement have significantly raised the profile of business action on climate risk, regulation and resilience.  In China, over half (54%) of business leaders are extremely concerned about climate change and environmental damage as a threat to business growth, equal with their levels of concern about geopolitical uncertainty and protectionism.

“The higher level of concern is being driven by larger societal and geopolitical shifts rather than the dynamics of business leaders’ own markets,” comments Bob Moritz, Global Chairman, PwC. “It’s clear their mid to long-term confidence in revenue growth is tempered by threats the business world is not used to tackling directly itself.”

Trust and leadership: CEOs divided over whether future economic growth will benefit the many or the few

Echoing the theme of the World Economic Forum this year, CEOs acknowledge that we live in a fractured world. They are divided over whether future economic growth will benefit the many or the few. They see the world moving towards new, multifaceted metrics to measure future prosperity.

Bob Moritz, Chairman, PwC comments:

“The higher levels of CEO concern about broader societal threats underlines how companies are navigating an increasingly fractured world. CEOs across every region and country that we spoke to recognise that the old ways of measuring growth and profit won’t work alone for the future. Particularly in the context of the Sustainable Development Goals, we’re likely to see more work developing and defining metrics that capture and communicate an organisation’s purpose in a way that is relevant to businesses’ stakeholders in the coming years.”

Examining the key challenges to trust for businesses, CEOs admit that delivering results in shorter periods of time (60%) is the main challenge. However, following this, there is a significant shift with the majority reporting higher levels of pressure to hold individual leaders to account (59%), including for misconduct. Over a third report more pressure from employees and customers to take political and social stances (38%) in public.

In the Banking and Capital Market (65%), Healthcare (65%) and Technology sectors (59%), the profile of leadership accountability was higher than average. So too were expectations in the US (70%), Brazil (67%), and the UK (63%).  High-profile debates on diversity, immigration, social inclusion and pay equity have raised employees’ expectations of leadership to engage in political and social issues, particularly in the US (51%), China (41%) and the UK (38%).

 

 

Excess liquidity in banks …bane or blessing

0

 

After writing a series of articles emphasizing liquidity as the life blood of banks and financial institutions, readers may be surprised about the above heading. I have deliberately chosen to sound a warning to banking and finance practitioners about the potential for excess liquidity to breed recklessness in investment decision making, if not managed effectively. Indeed, excess liquidity can be as bad as illiquidity!

It is just like reminding readers that sugar is sweet, but the availability and excessive consumption of sugar can kill and not even the witches will accept responsibility for such apparent suicide.

Whether or not a bulge in liquidity, emanating principally from the mandatory capital injection requested by the central bank would lead to an expansion of bad loan portfolios is a highly debatable topic. Some have opined that there is not much quality investible outlets to absorb the additional capital. They argue further that the availability of additional capital alone is not a catalyst for economic growth, to which the banks are expected to be central pillars.

This group of people even mention the absence of a robust enabling environment, pointing to the need for a paradigm shift in how the court and land administration systems negatively impact banking and finance operations.

Some have suggested that in the same way as the Ghana Revenue Authority is busy conscientizing the citizenry about the need to honour their tax obligations, there must be a similar and even more pressing need for the central bank and other state and civil society organizations to spearhead a clarion call on borrowers to honour bank loan repayment obligations.

Others have quickly countered that enough projects are in the horizon for the banks to support. What with the government’s intention to revive the rail sector and the enormous opportunities for private sector participation? What about the sea port expansion, the roads and related infrastructural projects, and the yawning opportunities in the aviation, agricultural, industrial, oil and gas sectors, and the one district one factory (1D1F) mantra?

Another school of thought, however, holds the view that clear policy prescriptions are still needed to clarify the extent of private sector participation in these apparently grand schemes. For the 1D1F initiative, for instance, some believe that little appears to be said about incentives, local raw materials components, how final output from these industries would compete with imported substitutes, among other grey issues. Do we continue with the open-ended import regime that stifles local production?

Further clarification would enable the banks and financial institutions to identify and set their risk appetite parameters in line with the increased capital. The banks are ready to respond to any laudable initiatives. How much risk a bank is willing to take is a function of its risk appetite which must be approved by the board, and usually communicated through a risk appetite statement.

Risk appetite is determined principally by the quantum and mix of capital and deposit liabilities, volatility of earnings, the availability of skilled personnel and the assessment of other environmental factors like the present or future state of the economy. The political and legal framework, the social and technological dynamics prevailing at a time or likely to exist in a pre-determined time horizon also affect the investment appetite of financial institutions.

Risk appetite may vary from one bank to the other, depending on the unique circumstances of each bank, and the factors stated above. Even for the same bank, risk appetite may not be static. It must reflect strategy, which includes the bank’s objectives, key aspects of the business, economic cyclicality and stakeholder expectations over time.

Other enabling environmental factors beyond the control of the various bank boardrooms are the twin issues of national identification and property addressing systems, the perennial problems of the budget deficits financing and the current account deficit in the balance of payments, both of which have significant effects on inflation and exchange rates simultaneously.

The question of whether bank credit expansion creates economic growth or economic growth fosters bank credit expansion have been examined in several economic development literatures. From whichever angle one debates the issue, the centrality of credit and the role of the financial intermediaries can hardly be ignored, given particular capital adequacy considerations and the bank’s embedded capacity to create credit through the multiplier effect.

In the midst of all these is the expectation of the shareholder or funds provider for appropriate return on equity. Bank boards are going to be under increasing pressure to meet the expectations of shareholders. The reality though, is that in the short term, at least, the probability of a dilution in return on equity cannot be downplayed.

Bank executives would naturally be examining their liquidity in terms of rising capital adequacy levels   in excess of mandatory requirements. The specific deposit mix of the individual banks will play a major part in how much credit could be extended.

The central bank is reported to have said that commercial bank borrowing from the regulator has seen a downward trend; an indication that either the banks are slowing down their loan portfolio expansion in the wake of deterioration of quality or that the gradual injection of new capital has boosted liquidity which is yet to be deployed.

Readers and other risk professionals familiar with the multifaceted causes of the American financial crisis of 2006- 2008 cannot shy away from the role of excess liquidity in the sub-prime lending during the debacle.

For starters, the American economy was awash with liquidity flowing from many oil producing countries which had generated windfalls from the then global fuel price hikes. These countries and their financial institutions obviously needed investible outlets for the accumulated funds. Expectedly, most of these funds found their way into the United States – the world’s biggest and strongest private sector led economy. Liquidity was therefore bursting at the seams and needed to be deployed, hence the evolution of complex securitization schemes aided in part by rating agencies.

A series of interventions, partly aided by a deliberately held low interest rate regime, a government intent on making housing delivery affordable to low income earners through the Community Reinvestment Act (CRA) and Fannie Mae/Freddie Mac, caused lenders to reduce standards in order to expand credit. The government tacitly encouraged financial institutions to make subprime home loans to those at the lower end of the income scale.

In no time, there was an abundance of loans to people who could not afford to repay them.  Compounding issues was a rise in executive emoluments tied to targeted loan book expansion, which in itself bred irresponsible risk taking, with eyes fixated on related bonuses. Eventually these loans went into default in large numbers, and that partly fueled the financial crisis.

Fingers were pointed at regulatory ineptitude and financial innovation that went awry or just didn’t live up to its promises of risk-sharing and risk-reduction. These created an excess of liquidity, with even jobless persons getting access to loans in expectation of future jobs- the NINJA loans (no income, no jobs, loan beneficiaries)

Why am I making inferences to the role excess liquidity played in the American financial crisis? The reason is that some elements of the crises appear to be playing out in the current Ghanaian banking and financial environment.

First is the issue of re-capitalisation which is not restricted to the universal banks. It is a sound requirement given the banks’ shrinking balance sheets, emaciated from high non-performing loans provisions, and until recently high rates of inflation. All the other non-bank financial institutions are under pressure to also increase their capital levels, just as the insurance industry regulator is requesting similar schemes from practising firms.

One can easily foresee intense pressure in the micro-finance arena where lenders’ operational wings have been clipped by the regulator in terms of the maximum loans they can give out or even deposits they can mobilise from single persons. Individually and collectively, that sector is going to lose out on competition to mainstream banks, which are capable of undercutting the former by lower interest charges. The natural urge to survive might push the micro-finance industry into less favourable lending schemes or they may hold on to excess liquidity, while their fixed costs bite them callously.

Evidently, to whom much is given, much would be expected. This holds equally true with the boards and management of these financial institutions who would be expected to produce higher returns on the additional equity, in an economy that has virtually stagnated over the last ten years. A relentless drive for market share could result in lowering credit standards as happened in the US.

Equally instructive to note is that, the central bank’s prime rate has seen a downward trend. The banks are expected to follow in a similar vein, constrained by other non-interest charges that impinge on their profitability.

How far these falling interest rates can be sustained in an economy whose fundamentals have hardly changed in the past decades remains to be understood. Just like the American borrowers who gleefully accepted adjustable rate mortgages at a time of low interest rates without bothering about their vulnerability to upward rate changes that they had signed up to, Ghanaian borrowers must be sensitized to understand that variable rate bank loans include a clause that permits the bank to adjust rates in tandem with prevailing conditions. The customer’s liberty to pay interest only while the principal is carried forward merely postpones doomsday.

Thus, if interest rates begin to rise to reflect the dynamics in the market, borrowers would be shocked, just like their American counterparts, that suddenly they cannot afford the adjustable rates; defaults would set in, re-possessions would rise and provisions would have to be made for loan losses, as the slow court processes exacerbate the banks’ difficulties.

That excess liquidity from re-capitalisation and potential deposit growth, coupled with intense competition can lead to reckless loan book generation is not an imagination of this writer. We witnessed   similar predatory lending practices leading to a bulge in loan expansion across the industry during the second half of President Kuffour’s tenure. The result was banks literally chasing customers to offer loans even in areas the banks had no footprint or could be ably supported by technology towards loan recoveries. Expectedly loan losses rose rapidly during the period.

To allay the fears expressed here, the regulator needs to assure us that better supervision than that which festered the dramatic corporate governance breakdowns in the erstwhile UT Bank and Capital Bank would reign supreme this time round. The pervasive permissiveness still lingering in some of the existing banks must be checked.

Of particular interest would be how the various bank boards of directors perceive their stewardship roles; their responsibilities, accountabilities and need for transparency. They should be able to rein in errant chief executives and their management from reckless loan expansion, much of which usually stems from unethical and unprofessional practices, and short-term expediencies. A failure to learn from history can be catastrophic for the financial market as government bail- out in Ghana seems less likely under the crunch of reducing budget deficits and prevailing high debt service ratios.

AfDB lifeline lifted Nigeria out of recession: Buhari

0

Nigerian President lauds Bank for standing tall among multilateral development banks and international financial institutions

The African Development Bank provided a much-needed lifeline at a time when it was very difficult to secure budget support loans from anywhere else, as the country struggled with the 2015-2016 economic recession, the Nigerian Government has said.

Speaking to a large audience of senior government officials, private sector, and development agencies as he opened the Bank’s world-class office complex in Abuja, Nigeria’s Vice-President, Yemi Osinbajo said the Bank had faithfully filled its role as a trusted advisor and an honest broker in the region and has earned its place as the voice of Africa on development issues.

He described the building as an important symbol of the special relationship between the Bank and Nigeria – a founding member and the largest shareholder of the Bank since its inception in 1964.

Osinbajo, who represented President Muhammadu Buhari, observed that the Bank’s High 5 development priorities, unveiled by African Development Bank President Akinwumi Adesina when he took office in 2015, is right on track – through investments in infrastructure, agriculture, education, health care, and increased access to affordable energy and water.

“Nigeria has been important in the growth of the institution as a major shareholder, donor and borrower all at the same time. And we have through the years shared the Bank’s vision and objectives. Just to underscore the love between the African Development Bank and Nigeria, we have loaned our own Dr. Akinwumi Adesina to the Bank, as he is to our great pride: Nigeria’s first President of the Bank.”

He noted that the Bank had evolved into one of the most efficient vehicles for Africa’s economic development and integration.

“More importantly, the Bank is to be commended for its ongoing efforts to close the gender gap, empower women and youths, and to ultimately strengthen and expand social safety nets for our most vulnerable populations.”

With its large market of over 185 million people, he assured that Nigeria would continue to be an important player in the Bank’s work, advancing efforts to boost regional integration within the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS) in particular and Africa as a whole.

“In Nigeria, the Bank has an active portfolio of close to US $6 billion spread over 73 projects across public and private sectors of the Nigerian economy. These projects continue to create thousands of direct and indirect jobs in many parts of our economy.”

He expressed delight that the Bank is working closely with the Government in addressing the challenges faced by communities and people emerging from the insurgency in the northeast and from unrest in the Niger Delta region.

“The Bank approved a budget support loan of US $1 billion in November 2016. The first tranche of US $600 million has been fully disbursed and utilized, and, in my discussions with the President of the Bank, we will be getting the remainder in the form of sector loans, so we are looking forward to the remaining US $400 million,” he said.

“The approval by the Bank sent a much-needed positive signal to the markets at a critical time for Nigeria and for this we will remain ever grateful,” Osinbajo said.

Kemi Adeosun, Nigeria’s Finance Minister, emphasized how the Bank’s lifeline prevented the country’s economy from slipping.

“The signaling effect of that singular act gave the country’s foreign reserves the much-needed boost, which helped stabilized the Nigerian currency – the Naira,” she said.

Nigeria is the African Development Bank’s largest shareholder with a portfolio of approximately US $6 billion and country operations accounting for 13% of the Bank’s total portfolio.

The Minister of Finance expressed Nigeria’s profound appreciation to the Bank for “doing business slightly differently from other multilateral development banks and international financial institutions.

“The African Development Bank rose in support of Africa and Nigeria when it mattered most. His Excellency Vice-President Osinbajo made the point when he referred to the US $1-billion budget support loan for which we have drawn only $600 million,” she explained.

The President of the African Development Bank, Akinwumi Adesina, thanked the Government of Nigeria for its very strong support.

“The Bank strongly supports Nigeria and always will. You can tell by our level of investments in Nigeria to the tune of $6 billion. From our perspective, our investments can only increase, as we expect levels to reach $8 billion by 2019,” Adesina said.

“Our support went beyond money: it demonstrated our strong commitment to help stabilize Africa’s largest economy,” he added.

The Bank, he said, will continue to support critical areas to boost growth, diversify the economy and create jobs in Nigeria. This, he said, includes support for youth in agriculture, small and medium-sized enterprises and the financial sector.

“We will accelerate support for infrastructure and the energy sector. Our investments are structured around our High 5 priorities: Light up and power Africa; Feed Africa; Industrialize Africa; Integrate Africa; and Improve the quality of life for the people of Africa,” Adesina said.

“We’ve invested US $500 million in the Development Bank of Nigeria. We expanded private equity investment in agriculture. We put in $18 million into the Fund for Financing Agriculture in Nigeria (FAFIN). This year, we will be investing this year $200 million in the Transmission Company of Nigeria to support the rehabilitation of existing transmission lines in partnership with the World Bank. We’ve invested $100 million in the Mainstream Power IPP in Jebba and Kanji, to add 700 MW to the national grid.

“Our private sector investment includes US $300 million in Dangote Industries to promote refining of petroleum products, and $100 million to support Indorama Eleme Fertilizer Company as part of a $1.2-billion syndicated financing package that will produce 1.4 million metric tonnes of fertilizers, and expect to generate $2.1 billion in export earnings over the project life. We invested over $134 million in Olam Nigeria Limited in agriculture.”

The Bank, he added, is providing US $263 million toward the rehabilitation of basic livelihoods in the northeast, with the expectation of providing water, sanitation, hygiene and health services that will benefit 14 million people, including 1.9 million Internally Displaced Persons.

The new office building, he explained, makes a bold statement that the African Development Bank is here to stay in Nigeria.

“It sends a strong message that the African Development Bank appreciates Nigeria. And it sends a message that Nigeria’s place in the integration of Africa, especially in West Africa, cannot be ignored. We cannot ignore the fact that Africa’s largest economy is now out of recession and projected to grow at 2.3% this year.

“I highly commend the Government for all the hard work and efforts to change the trajectory of the economy for good. Nigeria’s economy needs to grow at double digit rates to drive down poverty and create a massive number of jobs. That’s why the African Development Bank strongly supports the Economic Growth and Recovery Plan of Nigeria. We were there in the down time, we will also be there for Nigeria in the up time!”

Recent Posts

Most Popular

2026 Budget: Expert warns against ‘unguarded spending’ due debt relief gains   

By Kingsley Webora TANKEH As Finance Minister Dr. Cassiel Ato Forson prepares to present the 2026 Budget Statement in parliament today, a finance expert has...

Curbing gold smuggling could save US$2bn annually – GoldBod

By Kizito CUDJOE With illegal gold trading and smuggling estimated to be draining about US$2billion from national coffers each year, the Ghana Gold Board (GoldBod)...

Mandatory ethics training will define nation’s banking future – CIB Ghana

Plans by the Chartered Institute of Bankers (CIB) Ghana to make ethics and professional certification mandatory for all banking professionals represent one of the...

Sustained policy tightening and fiscal prudence driving inflation downturn – Stanbic Bank

Ghana’s ongoing disinflation trend is anchored by the combined strength of effective monetary policy, fiscal discipline, and a relatively stable exchange rate regime. That’s according...

UKGCC announces winners of UK-funded Grand Challenge Pitch event

The UK-Ghana Chamber of Commerce (UKGCC) has announced winners of its Grand Challenge Pitch event: Kodu Technology Limited, Delimush, Agri Mercab, and Wobil Technologies....