By Jules NARTEY-TOKOLI
Development in Ghana and across Africa has historically been a narrative shaped predominantly by governmental policies and international aid. While government-led initiatives have undeniably contributed to national progress, there exists a growing recognition that sustainable development cannot rely solely on state mechanisms.
This article delves into the historical precedents that have led communities to depend heavily on governmental support, explores the limitations of such an approach, and advocates for a paradigm shift towards community-driven development.
By empowering individuals and fostering collaborative efforts, communities can spearhead their own development through innovative structures like community development corporations (CDCs), capital raising through share floating, and the establishment of volunteer masterminds. This grassroots approach not only complements governmental efforts but also ensures that development is tailored to the unique needs of each community.
Historical Context: From Autonomy to Government Dependence
Historically, African communities thrived on communal support and collective decision-making, rooted in shared cultural and social values. These systems ensured the well-being of all community members and were reflected in governance, resource sharing and social structures. Communal land ownership, for instance, was a common practice, as seen among the Igbo people of Nigeria, where villages were organized around extended families and kinship ties, with land shared among members, and collective farming guaranteeing food security.
Similarly, the Kikuyu of Kenya employed communal decision-making through councils of elders, ensuring fairness and equity in land distribution and resource use. Democratic norms and egalitarian practices were also prevalent, as exemplified by the Tiv of Nigeria, where governance emphasized collective decision-making, with leadership roles rotated or assigned to councils of elders, and decisions reached through consensus.
The Ubuntu philosophy, common in Southern Africa, epitomized the interconnectedness and collective welfare of community members. It emphasized that individual well-being was tied to the community’s, fostering mutual aid and solidarity. This philosophy remains influential today, highlighting the deep roots of communal values in African history.
Traditional institutions, such as councils of elders or chiefs, played central roles in governance and conflict resolution in many pre-colonial African societies. These institutions operated under principles of consensus, transparency and inclusivity, aligning with the values of shared leadership and collective action.
Pre-colonial Ghanaian communities were likewise characterized by a strong emphasis on communal support and collective decision-making, deeply rooted in their sociocultural and political systems. In societies like the Akan, land was held collectively under the stewardship of chiefs or clan heads, ensuring equitable distribution of land use and promoting community welfare over individual wealth accumulation.
Decision-making in these communities was also often decentralized, involving councils of elders and chiefs, as seen among the Ashanti (Asante). These bodies, known as Abusua Panyin (family heads) and the Asanteman Council, operated on consensus, ensuring that diverse interests within clans and communities were represented. The extended family system served as a safety net, where kinship ties fostered collective responsibility, and resources and labor were shared during events like farming seasons, festivals, or communal projects.
These communal systems were vital for social cohesion and resilience. However, colonial rule disrupted these practices by imposing centralized and hierarchical governance structures, which often prioritized individualism over communalism. This restructuring laid the groundwork for a dependency on centralized governmental structures for development.
Post-independence, many African nations, including Ghana, inherited these centralized systems. Governments took on the mantle of driving development, often adopting top-down approaches that prioritized national over local needs.
While intentions were geared towards modernization and nation-building, the lack of local engagement and empowerment led to inefficiencies and unmet community needs. This historical trajectory entrenched a reliance on government for development, sidelining the potential of community-driven initiatives.
Despite this disruption, the enduring presence of traditional institutions in many parts of Africa, and Ghana, for that matter, today reflects the resilience and relevance of these communal values, highlighting the importance of revisiting and learning from these traditional systems to inform modern governance and development strategies.
The Limitations of Government-Only Development
Relying exclusively on government for development presents several challenges. Firstly, bureaucratic inefficiencies and corruption impede the effective allocation and utilization of resources. In Ghana, for instance, mismanagement of funds has occasionally stymied infrastructure projects and social programs intended to uplift communities.
Moreover, governments, regardless of their intentions, may not always be attuned to the specific needs of individual communities. The diversity of Ghana’s regions, each with unique cultural, economic and social landscapes, necessitates tailored development strategies that centralized planning often overlooks.
Furthermore, governments are bound by political cycles and competing priorities, which can result in inconsistent development efforts. Projects may start with enthusiasm but falter due to changes in leadership or shifting policy agendas.
This inconsistency undermines long-term development goals and erodes community trust in governmental initiatives. Additionally, with burgeoning populations and urbanization, the strain on government resources intensifies, making it increasingly difficult for state mechanisms to keep pace with the multifaceted development needs of all communities.
Ghana’s Decentralization Dilemma
While decentralization in Ghana has been pursued as a strategy to enhance local governance and improve development outcomes, it has faced several challenges that have limited its success. These shortcomings stem from both structural and operational inefficiencies within the system.
Ghana’s decentralization program, launched under the Local Government Act of 1993, aimed to transfer administrative, political and fiscal authority to local assemblies. However, the process has been hindered by the central government’s reluctance to cede significant powers.
Most local authorities remain dependent on centrally allocated funds, which are often delayed and insufficient to meet their mandates. This financial dependency undermines their autonomy and capacity to deliver essential services effectively
Political interference has also posed a significant barrier. District Chief Executives (DCEs), who play a key role in local governance, are appointed by the president rather than elected by the community.
This arrangement often leads to accountability issues, as these officials prioritize allegiance to the central government over responsiveness to local needs. Furthermore, the overlap between traditional and administrative authorities, particularly in land management, creates conflicts that hinder coordinated development efforts
Decentralization has also suffered from inadequate public participation and a lack of awareness among citizens about their role in the process. Many residents remain disconnected from decision-making, undermining the core principle of empowering communities to influence local governance.
Thus, while Ghana’s decentralization initiative is well-intentioned, its effectiveness has been limited by structural inefficiencies, political interference and weak financial autonomy. This is why community development corporations come in handy.
Empowering Individuals: The First Step Towards Community-Led Development
The transformation from government dependence to community-driven development begins with individual empowerment. Empowerment involves equipping self with the knowledge, skills and resources necessary to take charge of own development. This shift necessitates a rethinking of traditional roles and fostering a culture of self-reliance and innovation.
Self re-education plays a pivotal role in this empowerment. By prioritizing re-education of self away from the miseducation received through formal education; emphasizing critical thinking, entrepreneurship and technical skills, individuals are better prepared to identify and address local challenges.
Furthermore, fostering a mindset that values initiative and creativity encourages individuals to seek solutions beyond governmental provisions. Empowered individuals become catalysts for change, inspiring others and laying the groundwork for collective action.
Collaborative Efforts: Building Community Development Corporations
Once individuals are empowered, the next logical step is fostering collaboration to harness collective strengths. Community Development Corporations (CDCs) emerge as instrumental structures in this context. CDCs are locally governed entities that mobilize resources, coordinate projects, and implement development initiatives tailored to the community’s specific needs.
In Ghana, CDCs can play a transformative role by bridging gaps between various stakeholders, including local businesses, non-governmental organizations, financial institutions and international partners. These corporations facilitate the pooling of resources, knowledge and expertise, ensuring that development projects are both sustainable and impactful.
For instance, a CDC in a rural Ghanaian community might focus on developing agricultural technologies, improving irrigation systems, or establishing local markets that connect farmers directly to consumers, thereby enhancing economic resilience and food security.
Raising Capital Through Share Floating: Financial Independence and Growth
A critical aspect of community-driven development is financial autonomy. Traditional funding mechanisms often involve reliance on external aid or governmental grants, which can be restrictive and unsustainable in the long term. By floating shares, communities can raise capital to fund profit-making ventures that generate revenue for reinvestment in development projects.
This model empowers communities to control their financial destiny. For example, a community might establish a cooperative that manufactures local handicrafts. By issuing shares to community members, the cooperative can raise the necessary capital to set up production facilities, procure materials and market products.
Profits generated from sales can then be reinvested into infrastructure projects such as building schools, clinics, or roads, thereby creating a self-sustaining cycle of development fueled by local entrepreneurship.
Moreover, share floating democratizes ownership and decision-making, ensuring that profits are equitably distributed and reinvested within the community. This approach not only fosters economic growth but also builds financial literacy and a sense of ownership among community members.
Volunteer Masterminds: Leveraging Collective Expertise
Integral to the success of community-driven initiatives are volunteer masterminds—groups of dedicated individuals who collaborate to brainstorm, strategize, and execute development projects. These masterminds harness the diverse skills and expertise of community members, fostering innovation and problem-solving.
In Ghana, volunteer masterminds can take various forms, from informal gatherings of local leaders to structured committees focused on specific development sectors. These groups facilitate the exchange of ideas, encourage mentorship and provide a support system for entrepreneurs and project leaders. By leveraging collective expertise, volunteer masterminds can overcome challenges that might be insurmountable for individuals acting alone.
Additionally, these masterminds can serve as incubators for new ideas, testing and refining concepts before scaling them up. This iterative process ensures that development initiatives are well-conceived, effectively implemented, and sustainable in the long run.
The Economic Potential of Community-Driven Enterprises
The economic impact of community-driven enterprises can be profound. When individuals within a community establish companies with substantial revenue, the collective economic power can rival the GDP of many nations. For instance, in the technology sector, Ghanaian startups have the potential to grow into significant players in the African market and beyond, generating employment, fostering innovation, and contributing to national economic growth.
Consider the example of mPharma, a Ghanaian health tech company that manages prescription drug inventory for pharmacies and provides financing to drug manufacturers. By addressing inefficiencies in the pharmaceutical supply chain, mPharma not only improves healthcare outcomes but also creates economic opportunities within the community. As more such enterprises emerge, the cumulative economic contributions can drive significant development, reducing poverty, and enhancing the quality of life.
Challenges and the Path Forward
While the potential of community-driven development is immense, several challenges must be addressed to realize its full benefits. Access to capital remains a significant barrier, as many communities lack the financial resources to initiate and sustain development projects. Bridging this gap requires innovative financing solutions, such as floating of shares, microfinance, crowdfunding and impact investing, tailored to the unique needs of communities.
Moreover, fostering a culture of collaboration necessitates overcoming entrenched mindsets that prioritize individual success over collective well-being. Education and awareness campaigns by CDCs can play a crucial role in shifting perceptions, highlighting the benefits of cooperative efforts and shared prosperity.
Additionally, ensuring good corporate governance within CDCs is essential to prevent mismanagement and corruption. Establishing transparent processes, accountability mechanisms and inclusive decision-making practices can enhance the effectiveness and credibility of these entities.
In conclusion, rethinking development in Ghana and Africa calls for a departure from traditional, government-centric models towards a more inclusive, community-driven approach.
By empowering individuals, fostering collaboration and leveraging innovative financial mechanisms, communities can take charge of their own development trajectories. The formation of community development corporations, the strategic raising of capital through share floating and the establishment of volunteer masterminds are pivotal strategies that can unlock the vast potential within communities.
This shift not only addresses the limitations of relying solely on governmental initiatives but also aligns with the inherent communal values that have long been a cornerstone of African societies.
As communities harness their collective strengths and resources, they can achieve sustainable, impactful development that uplifts not just individual members but the community as a whole. In this re-imagined landscape, the power of community initiatives stands as a testament to the resilience, ingenuity and collaborative spirit of Ghanaian and African societies.
Please let’s interact: +1 (914) 259-0242 [email protected] www. soleilvision.com
The author is a dynamic entrepreneur and the Founder and Group CEO of Groupe Soleil Vision, made up of Soleil Consults (US), LLC, NubianBiz.com and Soleil Publications. He has an extensive background In Strategy, Management, Entrepreneurship, Premium Audit Advisory, And Web Consulting. With professional experiences spanning both Ghana and the United States, Jules has developed a reputation as a thought leader in fields such as corporate governance, leadership, e-commerce, and customer service. His publications explore a variety of topics, including economics, information technology, marketing and branding, making him a prominent voice in discussions on development and business innovation across Africa. Through NubianBiz.com, he actively champions intra-African trade and technology-driven growth to empower SMEs across the continent.
