Two boards, one foundation: Why the IASB and ISSB are partners, not rivals
Features

Two boards, one foundation: Why the IASB and ISSB are partners, not rivals

Dr. Sigmund E. Yevugah
Published August 10, 20269 min read

In every discipline, the questions that sound elementary are usually the most consequential.

Published by Juliet Etefe
80 views

Comment guidelines

Please keep comments respectful. Use plain English for our global readership and avoid using phrasing that could be misinterpreted as offensive. By commenting, you agree to abide by our community guidelines and these terms and conditions. We encourage you to report inappropriate comments.

All Comments0

No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts.

Related Coverage: Features

Gov’t by clarification
Features

Gov’t by clarification

Governments occasionally have to clarify themselves. Ministers misspeak. Journalists misunderstand technical explanations. Social media strips statements of context. None of this is unusual. But when clarification starts becoming a recurring feature of government, we should ask a different question: is the problem still communication, or has it become one of coordination?

When the Bench Speaks Like the Bar: Baffoe-Bonnie's Verdict on Government Performance Tests the Limits of Ghana's 1992 Settlement
Features

When the Bench Speaks Like the Bar: Baffoe-Bonnie's Verdict on Government Performance Tests the Limits of Ghana's 1992 Settlement

The Chief Justice's praise for SSNIT and MIIF, and his pointed question about "what we have been doing in the past eight years," was defensible as opinion but costly as precedent. Measured against his own predecessors and against chief justices in Washington, London, Ottawa and Canberra, the episode exposes a structural gap in Ghana's constitutional design: robust guarantees of institutional independence, but no settled convention on what a sitting Chief Justice should and should not say in public.