Ghana’s 1992 constitution has been crafted in such a way that article 25 and 28 specifically envisage a time when most Ghanaian children shall be educated. This concept is designed to make education progressively free for all children without any barriers.
Many governments, in their bid to achieve free education for all, have played various roles in ensuring that progressive education attains its full momentum. Consequently, various governments through their policies and programmes have specifically addressed one issue or another in their attempts at giving life to progressive education.
Since independence, the reality has been that no student had ever paid tuition fees in order to be taught in our public educational system. Successive governments have introduced innovative policies to deal with opportunity cost, and many of such interventions were designed to address specific needs of children.
In the history of Ghana’s educational system, various governments – including the current one – have resorted to the use of a social development and protection approach in redefining basic education from kindergarten to the senior high school level. But in the Free SHS programme, social development is more dominant in its implementation than the concept of protection. This seeks to provide support for all Ghanaian children who qualify to access senior high school education in the country. Both the rich and the poor have all been given an equal platform and opportunity to access education. Once you qualify to access education, your right to education is assured.
Impact of the programme
Indeed, as a country we cannot deny the impact Free SHS has had on Ghana’s attempt to educate its children to a level where the child can be guaranteed of his or her safety in making decisions which concern the future. Indeed, we can also say it is a fulfilment of the desire of the 1992 constitution of Ghana. The right to education is a constitutional mandate that is inherent and a major determinant in the enjoyment of other fundamental human rights.
As a result of Free SHS, for the first time in the history of Ghana the country has comprehensive data on students in senior high school which can be used for projection, proper planning and decision-making.
Indeed, I am personally amazed by the support it has given to children in cocoa-growing communities of the country. Child Rights International (CRI), currently works in 1,121 cocoa-growing communities across almost all the cocoa districts. Data collected on 42,000 households from August 2018 to December 2019 – with a household membership of 178,514 – revealed that 84% of children of cocoa farmers who qualified to access secondary education had gained admission to SHS and had been placed. The exponential rate of enrolment in cocoa-growing communities is enormous, to the extent that it cannot be compared with when cocoa farmers were under COCOBOD’s scholarship programme.
One of such examples in one of our many communities is a boy (name withheld) from a remote village without electricity who had aggregate 12. With support from the Ministry of Education, he was placed in Mfantsipim School and he is doing great exploits. Another child (female) in Sekyere Adiembra (name withheld) is currently at Sekondi College and excelling. I believe that many would not have gotten that opportunity but for this programme.
CRI with support from the Ghana Education Service has placed 17 children from typical rural communities in ‘Grade A’ schools, and they are doing very well.
Issues surrounding the programme
Despite the great attributes of Free SHS, there are challenges. These mainly stemmed from introduction of the ‘double-track’ system and a lack of consistency and transparency in communicating well the policy to Ghanaians. Though the policy was driven on the wheels of the New Patriotic Party’s political manifesto, seasons and times must be observed in order to situate it within the public arena for public acceptance and legitimacy. This would be a perfect way to ensure the legacy of the policy, and also halt any attempt by political hands to change it.
Since this cannot be guaranteed right now, it is necessary for government to formalise in law the concept of Free SHS, knowing the immense benefit of the programme. As much as possible, to reduce the political effect in tossing out such policies, the programme must be regulated by law in order to maintain consistency and prevent any future government from altering it to suit its own parochial interests or party agenda.
Legislating the Free SHS would clearly define the funding source for continuous implementation of the policy. The current implementation and budget is purely based on exercise of discretion by the executives. This exercise of discretion is favouring the policy because of the interest and passion gvernment executives, led by President Nana Addo Dankwa Akufo-Addo, have for the policy.
Additionally, once you legislate the Free SHS policy, it would spell out a clear plan to improve infrastructure for abolishment of the ‘double-track’ system – which in my opinion is a bane to the policy’s beauty. The double-track system has created a situation wherein both green and gold tracks spend substantial amounts of time at home – ranging from 40 to 45 days depending on which track is in school.
This system has created a huge burden for parents in providing support for children, especially children in the rural communities. In the urban cities, parents who can afford to occupy their children through extra classes do so. But those who cannot, are left to see their children engage in all manner of activities which have the potential of creating social disorder in their lives.
Again, children who come from rural communities are hardly hit by the issue of accommodation – whereby parents are compelled to rent places for their children near the school under unsupervised environment. This makes children below 16 years more vulnerable to the environment, and therefore potentially more exposed to deviant characters in society.
A social development programme is a social investment. In business strategy, any investment made should yield profit. Therefore, a social development programme should not, under any circumstances, create another social problem that will cost the state so much to deal with in the future.
Legislating on the policy will define elements of cost that are free, and cost required of parents, in order to ensure holistic implementation of the policy. Additionally, legislating the policy would clearly set performance indicators to be achieved by duty-bearers against the social investment the State would make in our children’s development.
To conclude, as a nation we are duty-bound to promote the development and protection of our children. It is an obligation to do so, and a privilege to have such opportunity to serve our children.