Economic ‘Game Changer’? African leaders launch free-trade zone

  • African leaders meet to discuss key details of free-trade bloc
  • Potential for Africa’s US$3.4trillion economy is massive

African leaders launched a continental free-trade zone on Sunday, which if successful will unite 1.3 billion people, create a US$3.4trillion economic bloc, and usher in a new era of development.

After four years of talks, an agreement to form a 55-nation trade bloc was reached in March, paving the way for Sunday’s African Union summit in Niger – where Ghana was announced as host of the trade zone’s future headquarters and discussions were held on how exactly the bloc will operate.

It is hoped that the African Continental Free Trade Area (AfCFTA) – the largest since creation of the World Trade Organisation in 1994 – will help unlock Africa’s long-stymied economic potential by boosting intra-regional trade, strengthening supply chains, and spreading expertise.

“The eyes of the world are turned toward Africa,” Egyptian President and African Union Chairman Abdel Fattah al-Sisi said at the summit’s opening ceremony.

“The success of the AfCFTA will be the real test to achieve the economic growth that will turn our people’s dream of improved welfare and quality of life into a reality,” he said.

Africa has much catching up to do: its intra-regional trade accounted for just 17% of exports in 2017 versus 59% in Asia and 69% in Europe, and Africa has missed out on the economic booms that other trade blocs have experienced in recent decades.

See Also:  Africa’s total merchandise trade valued over $997.9 billion in 2018

Economists say significant challenges remain: including poor road and rail links, large areas of unrest, excessive border bureaucracy and petty corruption which have held back growth and integration.

Members have committed to eliminating tariffs on most goods, which will increase trade in the region by 15-25% in the medium-term; but this will more than double if the other issues are dealt with, according to International Monetary Fund (IMF) estimates.

The IMF, in a May report, described the free-trade zone as a potential “economic game changer” of the kind that has boosted growth in Europe and North America, but added a note of caution.

“Reducing tariffs alone is not sufficient,” it said.

Divergent Interests

Africa already has an alphabet soup of competing and overlapping trade zones – ECOWAS in the west, EAC in the east, SADC in the south and COMESA in the east and south.

But only the EAC, driven mainly by Kenya, has made significant progress toward a common market in goods and services.

These regional economic communities (REC) will continue to trade among themselves as they do now. The role of AfCFTA is to liberalise trade among those member-states that are not currently in the same REC, said Trudi Hartzenberg – director at Tralac, a South Africa-based trade law organisation.

The zone’s potential clout received a boost on Tuesday when Nigeria, the largest economy in Africa, agreed to sign the agreement at the summit. Benin has also since agreed to join. Fifty-four of the continent’s 55 states have now signed up, but only about half of these have ratified.

See Also:  More partnerships will deepen intra-African trade – Yofi Grant

One obstacle in negotiations will be the countries’ conflicting motives.

For undiversified but relatively developed economies like Nigeria, which relies heavily on oil exports, the benefits of membership will likely be smaller than others, said John Ashbourne, senior emerging markets economist at Capital Economics.

Nigerian officials have expressed concern that the country could be flooded with low-priced goods, confounding efforts to encourage moribund local manufacturing and expand farming.

In contrast, South Africa’s manufacturers – which are among the most developed in Africa, could quickly expand outside their usual export markets and into West and North Africa, giving them an advantage over manufacturers from other countries, Ashbourne said.

The presidents of both countries attended the summit.

The vast difference in countries’ economic heft is another complicating factor in negotiations. Nigeria, Egypt and South Africa account for over 50% of Africa’s cumulative GDP, while its six sovereign island nations represent about 1%.

“It will be important to address those disparities to ensure that special and differential treatments for the least developed countries are adopted and successfully implemented,” said Landry Signe, a fellow at the Brookings Institution’s Africa Growth Initiative.

The summit also saw the launch of a digital payments system for the zone, and instruments that will govern rules of origin and tariff concessions, as well as monitor and seek to eliminate non-tariff obstacles to trade, the African Union said.

Leave a Reply

Please Login to comment
  Subscribe  
Notify of